diff --git a/extreview/approved.rst b/extreview/approved.rst index 852374db..a09aeb11 100644 --- a/extreview/approved.rst +++ b/extreview/approved.rst @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ track the extension approval process. Flask-Babel ----------- -First Approval: 2010-07-23 -Last Review: 2010-07-23 -Approved version: 0.6 -Approved license: BSD +:First Approval: 2010-07-23 +:Last Review: 2010-07-23 +:Approved version: 0.6 +:Approved license: BSD Notes: Developed by the Flask development head @@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ How to improve: add a better long description to the next release Flask-SQLAlchemy ---------------- -First Approval: 2010-07-25 -Last Review: 2010-07-25 -Approved version: 0.9 -Approved license: BSD +:First Approval: 2010-07-25 +:Last Review: 2010-07-25 +:Approved version: 0.9 +:Approved license: BSD Notes: Developed by the Flask development head diff --git a/extreview/listed.rst b/extreview/listed.rst index 426e6ce4..cd658e92 100644 --- a/extreview/listed.rst +++ b/extreview/listed.rst @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ contain extensions that are approved. Flask-CouchDB ------------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed version: 0.2 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed version: 0.2 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test". Flask-CouchDBKit ---------------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.2 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.2 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test". Flask-Creole ------------ -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.2 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.2 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ file is empty. flask-csrf ---------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.2 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.2 Will not be approved because this is functionality that should be handled in the form handling systems which is for Flask-WTF already the case. @@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ Considered for unlisting. Flask-Genshi ------------ -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.3 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.3 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ requirement for approved extensions. flask-lesscss ------------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.9.1 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.9.1 Broken package description, nonconforming package name, does not follow standard API rules (init_lesscss instead of lesscss). @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ as a testsuite. flask-mail ---------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.3.1 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.3.1 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ but I don't see any big design problems there. Flask-OAuth ----------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.9 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.9 Short long description, missing tests. @@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ Short long description, missing tests. Flask-OpenID ------------ -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 1.0.1 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 1.0.1 Short long description, missing tests. @@ -119,8 +119,8 @@ Short long description, missing tests. Flask-Script ------------ -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.2 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.2 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -133,8 +133,8 @@ description" in the package index though. Flask-Testing ------------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.2 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.2 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -144,8 +144,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test". Flask-Themes ------------ -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.1 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.1 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test". Flask-Uploads ------------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.1 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.1 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test". Flask-WTF --------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.2.1 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.2.1 Would be fine for approval, but the test suite is not part of the sdist package (missing entry in MANIFEST.in) and the test suite does not respond @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ to either "make test" or "python setup.py test". Flask-XML-RPC ------------- -Last-Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed Version: 0.2.1 +:Last-Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed Version: 0.2.1 Missing tests, API wise it would be fine for approval. diff --git a/extreview/unlisted.rst b/extreview/unlisted.rst index a953f363..6168c912 100644 --- a/extreview/unlisted.rst +++ b/extreview/unlisted.rst @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -Rejected Extensions +Unlisted Extensions =================== This is a list of extensions that is currently rejected from listing and @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ improved to be listed. Flask-Actions ------------- -Last Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed version: 0.2 +:Last Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed version: 0.2 Rejected because of missing description in PyPI, formatting issues with the documentation (missing headlines, scrollbars etc.) and a general clash @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ Futhermore it also has an egg registered with an invalid filename. Flask-Jinja2Extender -------------------- -Last Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed version: 0.1 +:Last Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed version: 0.1 Usecase not obvious, hacky implementation, does not solve a problem that could not be solved with Flask itself. I suppose it is to aid other @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ extensions, but that should be discussed on the mailinglist. Flask-Markdown -------------- -Last Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed version: 0.2 +:Last Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed version: 0.2 Would be great for enlisting but it should follow the API of Flask-Creole. Besides that, the docstrings are not valid rst (run through rst2html to @@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ see the issue) and it is missing tests. Otherwise fine :) flask-urls ---------- -Last Review: 2010-07-25 -Reviewed version: 0.9.2 +:Last Review: 2010-07-25 +:Reviewed version: 0.9.2 Broken PyPI index and non-conforming extension name. Due to the small featureset this was also delisted from the list. It was there previously