forked from orbit-oss/flask
Updated appdispatch pattern
This commit is contained in:
parent
45b97d14e3
commit
60de3f295b
1 changed files with 94 additions and 18 deletions
|
|
@ -3,6 +3,43 @@
|
||||||
Application Dispatching
|
Application Dispatching
|
||||||
=======================
|
=======================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Application dispatching is the process of combining multiple Flask
|
||||||
|
applications on the WSGI level. You can not only combine Flask
|
||||||
|
applications into something larger but any WSGI application. This would
|
||||||
|
even allow you to run a Django and a Flask application in the same
|
||||||
|
interpreter side by side if you want. The usefulness of this depends on
|
||||||
|
how the applications work internally.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is fundamentally different from the :ref:`module approach
|
||||||
|
<larger-applications>` is that in this case you are running the same or
|
||||||
|
different Flask applications that are entirely isolated from each other.
|
||||||
|
They run different configurations and are dispatched on the WSGI level.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Combining Applications
|
||||||
|
----------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If you have entirely separated applications and you want them to work next
|
||||||
|
to each other in the same Python interpreter process you can take
|
||||||
|
advantage of the :class:`werkzeug.wsgi.DispatcherMiddleware`. The idea
|
||||||
|
here is that each Flask application is a valid WSGI application and they
|
||||||
|
are combined by the dispatcher middleware into a larger one that
|
||||||
|
dispatched based on prefix.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For example you could have your main application run on `/` and your
|
||||||
|
backend interface on `/admin`::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from werkzeug.wsgi import DispatcherMiddleware
|
||||||
|
from frontend_app import application as frontend
|
||||||
|
from backend_app import application as backend
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
application = DispatcherMiddleware(frontend, {
|
||||||
|
'/backend': backend
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dispatch by Subdomain
|
||||||
|
---------------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Sometimes you might want to use multiple instances of the same application
|
Sometimes you might want to use multiple instances of the same application
|
||||||
with different configurations. Assuming the application is created inside
|
with different configurations. Assuming the application is created inside
|
||||||
a function and you can call that function to instanciate it, that is
|
a function and you can call that function to instanciate it, that is
|
||||||
|
|
@ -10,21 +47,17 @@ really easy to implement. In order to develop your application to support
|
||||||
creating new instances in functions have a look at the
|
creating new instances in functions have a look at the
|
||||||
:ref:`app-factories` pattern.
|
:ref:`app-factories` pattern.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Dispatch by Subdomain
|
|
||||||
---------------------
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A very common example would be creating applications per subdomain. For
|
A very common example would be creating applications per subdomain. For
|
||||||
instance you configure your webserver to dispatch all requests for all
|
instance you configure your webserver to dispatch all requests for all
|
||||||
subdomains to your application and you then use the subdomain information
|
subdomains to your application and you then use the subdomain information
|
||||||
to create user-specific instances.
|
to create user-specific instances. Once you have your server set up to
|
||||||
|
listen on all subdomains you can use a very simple WSGI application to do
|
||||||
|
the dynamic application creation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Once you have your server set up to listen on all subdomains you can use a
|
The perfect level for abstraction in that regard is the WSGI layer. You
|
||||||
very simple WSGI application to do the dynamic application creation.
|
write your own WSGI application that looks at the request that comes and
|
||||||
|
and delegates it to your Flask application. If that application does not
|
||||||
The code for the dispatching looks roughly like this:
|
exist yet, it is dynamically created and remembered::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. sourcecode:: python
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
from threading import Lock
|
from threading import Lock
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -43,21 +76,16 @@ The code for the dispatching looks roughly like this:
|
||||||
with self.lock:
|
with self.lock:
|
||||||
app = self.instances.get(subdomain)
|
app = self.instances.get(subdomain)
|
||||||
if app is None:
|
if app is None:
|
||||||
app = self.make_app(subdomain)
|
app = self.create_app(subdomain)
|
||||||
self.instances[subdomain] = app
|
self.instances[subdomain] = app
|
||||||
return app
|
return app
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def make_app(self, subdomain):
|
|
||||||
return self.create_app(subdomain)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def __call__(self, environ, start_response):
|
def __call__(self, environ, start_response):
|
||||||
app = self.get_application(environ['HTTP_HOST'])
|
app = self.get_application(environ['HTTP_HOST'])
|
||||||
return app(environ, start_response)
|
return app(environ, start_response)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If you want to use it, you can do something like this:
|
This dispatcher can then be used like this::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. sourcecode:: python
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
from myapplication import create_app, get_user_for_subdomain
|
from myapplication import create_app, get_user_for_subdomain
|
||||||
from werkzeug.exceptions import NotFound
|
from werkzeug.exceptions import NotFound
|
||||||
|
|
@ -76,3 +104,51 @@ If you want to use it, you can do something like this:
|
||||||
return create_app(user)
|
return create_app(user)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
application = SubdomainDispatcher('example.com', make_app)
|
application = SubdomainDispatcher('example.com', make_app)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dispatch by Path
|
||||||
|
----------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Dispatching by a path on the URL is very similar. Instead of looking at
|
||||||
|
the `Host` header to figure out the subdomain one simply looks at the
|
||||||
|
request path up to the first slash::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from threading import Lock
|
||||||
|
from werkzeug.wsgi import pop_path_info, peek_path_info
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
class PathDispatcher(object):
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def __init__(self, default_app, create_app):
|
||||||
|
self.default_app = default_app
|
||||||
|
self.create_app = create_app
|
||||||
|
self.lock = Lock()
|
||||||
|
self.instances = {}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def get_application(self, prefix):
|
||||||
|
with self.lock:
|
||||||
|
app = self.instances.get(prefix)
|
||||||
|
if app is None:
|
||||||
|
app = self.create_app(prefix)
|
||||||
|
if app is not None:
|
||||||
|
self.instances[prefix] = app
|
||||||
|
return app
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def __call__(self, environ, start_response):
|
||||||
|
app = self.get_application(peek_path_info(environ))
|
||||||
|
if app is not None:
|
||||||
|
pop_path_info(environ)
|
||||||
|
else:
|
||||||
|
app = self.default_app
|
||||||
|
return app(environ, start_response)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The big difference between this and the subdomain one is that this one
|
||||||
|
falls back to another application if the creator function returns `None`::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
from myapplication import create_app, default_app, get_user_for_prefix
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def make_app(prefix):
|
||||||
|
user = get_user_for_prefix(prefix)
|
||||||
|
if user is not None:
|
||||||
|
return create_app(user)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
application = PathDispatcher('example.com', default_app, make_app)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue