Fix some typos.

This commit is contained in:
Georg Brandl 2010-05-30 01:53:08 +08:00 committed by Armin Ronacher
parent 8e4bcaf576
commit 63caf6e158

View file

@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ Would look like this instead::
return 'Hello World!' return 'Hello World!'
There are three major reasons for this. The most important one is that There are three major reasons for this. The most important one is that
implicit application objects require that there may only be one class at implicit application objects require that there may only be one instance at
the time. There are ways to fake multiple application with a single the time. There are ways to fake multiple applications with a single
application object, like maintaining a stack of applications, but this application object, like maintaining a stack of applications, but this
causes some problems I won't outline here in detail. Now the question is: causes some problems I won't outline here in detail. Now the question is:
when does a microframework need more than one application at the same when does a microframework need more than one application at the same
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ something it can be very helpful to create a minimal application to test
specific behavior. When the application object is deleted everything it specific behavior. When the application object is deleted everything it
allocated will be freed again. allocated will be freed again.
Another thing that becomes possible when you have an explicit object laying Another thing that becomes possible when you have an explicit object lying
around in your code is that you can subclass the base class around in your code is that you can subclass the base class
(:class:`~flask.Flask`) to alter specific behaviour. This would not be (:class:`~flask.Flask`) to alter specific behaviour. This would not be
possible without hacks if the object were created ahead of time for you possible without hacks if the object were created ahead of time for you