Merge pull request #1539 from mjhennig/with_metaclass
Improve function with_metaclass()
This commit is contained in:
commit
7f38674915
1 changed files with 4 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -54,23 +54,14 @@ else:
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
def with_metaclass(meta, *bases):
|
||||
"""Create a base class with a metaclass."""
|
||||
# This requires a bit of explanation: the basic idea is to make a
|
||||
# dummy metaclass for one level of class instantiation that replaces
|
||||
# itself with the actual metaclass. Because of internal type checks
|
||||
# we also need to make sure that we downgrade the custom metaclass
|
||||
# for one level to something closer to type (that's why __call__ and
|
||||
# __init__ comes back from type etc.).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# This has the advantage over six.with_metaclass in that it does not
|
||||
# introduce dummy classes into the final MRO.
|
||||
class metaclass(meta):
|
||||
__call__ = type.__call__
|
||||
__init__ = type.__init__
|
||||
# itself with the actual metaclass.
|
||||
class metaclass(type):
|
||||
def __new__(cls, name, this_bases, d):
|
||||
if this_bases is None:
|
||||
return type.__new__(cls, name, (), d)
|
||||
return meta(name, bases, d)
|
||||
return metaclass('temporary_class', None, {})
|
||||
return type.__new__(metaclass, 'temporary_class', (), {})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Certain versions of pypy have a bug where clearing the exception stack
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue