Reviewed all extensions and wrote down notes.

extreview/rejected.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+Rejected Extensions
+===================
+
+This is a list of extensions that is currently rejected from listing and
+with that also not approved.  If an extension ends up here it should
+improved to be listed.
+
+
+Flask-Actions
+-------------
+
+Last Review: 2010-07-25
+Reviewed version: 0.2
+
+Rejected because of missing description in PyPI, formatting issues with
+the documentation (missing headlines, scrollbars etc.) and a general clash
+of functionality with the Flask-Script package.  Latter should not be a
+problem, but the documentation should improve.  For listing, the extension
+developer should probably discuss the extension on the mailinglist with
+others.
+
+Futhermore it also has an egg registered with an invalid filename.
+
+
+Flask-Jinja2Extender
+--------------------
+
+Last Review: 2010-07-25
+Reviewed version: 0.1
+
+Usecase not obvious, hacky implementation, does not solve a problem that
+could not be solved with Flask itself.  I suppose it is to aid other
+extensions, but that should be discussed on the mailinglist.
+
+
+Flask-Markdown
+--------------
+
+Last Review: 2010-07-25
+Reviewed version: 0.2
+
+Would be great for enlisting but it should follow the API of Flask-Creole.
+Besides that, the docstrings are not valid rst (run through rst2html to
+see the issue) and it is missing tests.  Otherwise fine :)
+
+
+flask-urls
+----------
+
+Last Review: 2010-07-25
+Reviewed version: 0.9.2
+
+Broken PyPI index and non-conforming extension name.  Due to the small
+featureset this was also delisted from the list.  It was there previously
+before the approval process was introduced.